3 ms·

I'm part way through it and while it mentions recognition of fetal personhood in the past it only seems to use that to establish that there's no precedent for t

by usrn 4y ago

I'm part way through it and while it mentions recognition of fetal personhood in the past it only seems to use that to establish that there's no precedent for this idea of a right to abortion.

gonehome 4y ago
For clarity I’m not talking about the text of this opinion, but the larger argument that’s happening outside of it. I think you’re probably accurate about this decision and its consequences in the short term, but I thought you were missing why this could have a bigger effect in the long term.
- gonehome 4y ago
  Outside of the edit window, but this has some of the context I’m talking about: https://apple.news/AUTfqLmWMSnC7Rz1M7QpH-Q https://apple.news/AUTfqLmWMSnC7Rz1M7QpH-Q