2 ms·
Three patent pools, and some major companies that you need patents for aren't in any of them. Also unlike H.264, there was no limit to how much you could spend
by gjsman-1000 5y ago
Three patent pools, and some major companies that you need patents for aren't in any of them. Also unlike H.264, there was no limit to how much you could spend on licensing every year. And that was only the beginning of the disaster.
https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=31318663&goto=item%3Fid%3D31317989%2331318663 https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=31318663&goto=item%3Fi...
- ksec 5y ago>there was no limit to how much you could spend on licensing every year. Both MPEG-LA and HEVC Advance offer Max Cap per year.
- gjsman-1000 5y agoMPEG LA had a cap, Access Advance (formerly known as HEVC Advance) now has a cap though I do not believe there was a cap originally. However, my statement is still correct because to use HEVC you need to also talk to Velos Media (pricing and terms not public), and you also need to contact several individual companies not in pools like Technicolor (who also do not have their pricing and terms public). EDIT: HEVC / Access Advance does have a cap if you put their branding on any product you make containing HEVC technologies - including, oddly, 4K Blu Ray discs (see LOTR Extended Edition 4K, it has the HEVC logo on the box, as if literally anyone cares about HEVC as a brand). If you don't put their logo on your products, no caps.
- ksec 5y ago>If you don't put their logo on your products, no caps. New HEVC-Only Platform License - Royalty Rate Structure for Licensees In-Compliance without Trademark Discount has Caps. And the Standard Structure for HEVC Licensees with no caps are there for specific uses only under trademark dispute.