3 ms·
Sorry, but that is a cute way to say "take water from people who have it". For decades, southwest states have put up billboards in rust belt states to entice w
by kmbfjr 4y ago
Sorry, but that is a cute way to say "take water from people who have it".
For decades, southwest states have put up billboards in rust belt states to entice workers to move in order to keep workers filling their economies. Much to do was always made about the great climate. So if climate is an economic advantage, so is easy access to water.
These large bodies of water are not just for irrigation, they are the method for which much of the nation's harvest of grain is moved to eastern ports. It still is used to move the raw materials for steel production. Tapping the Great Lakes to support California's insatiable thirst will only drop the lakes to a level where shipping becomes unprofitable.
Climate change is already making food growing possible in some formerly unlikely locations. I'm exactly at latitude 42 degrees (it runs right through my living room). Not a mile from my home, they grow broccoli and other vegetables right up until December 1, unheard of twenty years ago. They are now on the second planting of lettuce a week into May.
Climate change is going to take that market away from these states whether they have water or not.
- 01100011 4y agoYeah why don't you head to the southeast the next time they have a flood event and tell them that they need to keep all that water and also they can't have anymore produce from west of the rockies. It's hard to take you seriously when you suggest we're going to drain the great lakes. Do you think the only supply of freshwater the west could tap is the great lakes? The breadbasket of the US, the great plains, is also prone to water insecurity. This isn't just about the west. Climate change will bring unpredictable change and we need a way to move water around. You never know, you could be living under a drought in 20 years. Will you still fight water redistribution then?