4 ms·
It's expensive to hire NLP labor right now, and has been for awhile. Seems like one strategy could be: HF provides a cheaper & more scalable alternative to havi
by k8si 4y ago
It's expensive to hire NLP labor right now, and has been for awhile. Seems like one strategy could be: HF provides a cheaper & more scalable alternative to having to hire an in-house NLP team. Basically NLP becomes synonymous with HF.
And they amortize the cost of hiring their own NLP engineers by developing a few models/model-based services that lots of businesses would be willing to pay for. E.g. 'foundation models' for different verticals like healthcare etc. Then it'll also be a lot easier to either fully automate or at least scale up work that's specific to each paying customer (because fine-tuning should go much more quickly, just essentially be a hyperparameter tuning cycle in as many cases as they can get away with).
- visarga 4y agoNLP engineers spend 10% of their time training models, and 90% preparing the dataset and learning about the specifics of the task. I don't think this scales like selling software.