4 ms·
Although I also have issue w/the Elixir docs, they tend to have more explanations in them than the Erlang ones. Marginally :) I am one who came not from Ruby,
by srevenant 4y ago
Although I also have issue w/the Elixir docs, they tend to have more explanations in them than the Erlang ones. Marginally :)
I am one who came not from Ruby, btw. My roots come from a variety of things including Smalltalk, C, C++, Perl (dare I admit), Java, Javascript and Python, among those most influential on my life (and in that order).
I'm really happy w/Elixir, finally getting back to a better true object oriented system (for those who know the roots of such).
- devoutsalsa 4y agoReminds me of this blog post: "The Most Object-Oriented Language" => https://blog.noredink.com/post/142689001488/the-most-object-oriented-language https://blog.noredink.com/post/142689001488/the-most-object-...
- srevenant 4y agoYep :) Anybody familiar with the roots of OO will understand how wildly Java/C++ and their ilk went off the rails. It wasn't intended as a code organizational system. It's about encapsulation of needs, actors, and sending messages back and forth.