The author of this unsourced hit piece explains where the skew comes from: Bjørn Lomborg has engaged in poor science at best, if not whole cloth scientific misc

The author of this unsourced hit piece explains where the skew comes from: Bjørn Lomborg has engaged in poor science at best, if not whole cloth scientific misconduct[1], suppressed dissent about his works as head of a government institution[2], and works for the right-wing Hoover Institute which has published such... high-quality works as "The Pseudoscience of Global Warming"[3]. Clearly, the author of this op-ed is more than willing to bend their scientific thought to suit their political goals. [1]: https://web.archive.org/web/20150316130136/http://www.cprm.gov.br/33IGC/1343527.html https://web.archive.org/web/20150316130136/http://www.cprm.g... [2]: http://www.lomborg-errors.dk/lomborgstory15.htm http://www.lomborg-errors.dk/lomborgstory15.htm [3]: https://www.hoover.org/research/pseudoscience-global-warming https://www.hoover.org/research/pseudoscience-global-warming