> replaced it with equality of outcomes Not consistently. If you point out there are outcomes where "minorities" do better, e.g. women living longer than men o

> replaced it with equality of outcomes Not consistently. If you point out there are outcomes where "minorities" do better, e.g. women living longer than men on average, and suggest we fix this by e.g. spending more government funding on men's health research, suddenly the "pro-equality" people try to change the topic, or claim that the difference is "biological" and therefore shouldn't be meddled with (an attitude they would of course call sexist if the advantage were in the other direction).