As an example of literate programming, this is very well done, and the presentation is very pretty. With that said, it is not the ideal way (for me) to explain

As an example of literate programming, this is very well done, and the presentation is very pretty. With that said, it is not the ideal way (for me) to explain code. There is too much too read, even with the TOC. What I want, instead, is distillation. I want the energy spent on meticulous comments to be redirected into simplification and reduction -- still with a few well-chosen comments for support. For comparison, even with 0 explanation, I can understand this 57 line hyperscript wordle (a language have almost no experience with): https://arhamjain.com/hyperwordle/ https://arhamjain.com/hyperwordle/ much more quickly than I could read through the literate version. I understand the goals of each are not exactly the same, but I think both are trying to "clearly and efficiently communicate what the program is doing." Perhaps a presentation of the literate version where I could suppress all the exposition and dig into it only as needed would help.