3 ms·
Yes, Krugman responded after throwing something like that in ether. Doesn't make him right or more knowledgeable having to reassess his original thinking. Also
by jakupovic 4y ago
Yes, Krugman responded after throwing something like that in ether. Doesn't make him right or more knowledgeable having to reassess his original thinking.
Also, Krugman had to go back on his take of the internet, all I'm saying is that none can predict future and the "smartest" of us can be and often are wrong.
- ShamelessC 4y agoSure, I'm just suggesting your argument isn't terribly convincing. Maybe stick to the actual merits of the tech rather than appeal to the inability of humanity to accurately predict the future. That's not as much of a guarantee of success as you think, and indicates you are biased.
- jakupovic 4y agoMy argument, around knowing the future, which is 100% correct, as none can. What is your argument? Crypto doesn't work because you said so? My point is that people presumably smarter than you, have in the past said things which turned out to be wrong. So then what evidence do you have other than your words? At least I brought a quote to illustrate my point. You brought a subsequent explanation by the author why they were wrong. I'm expecting the same from you, in 8 years, saying how you were wrong. Thanks ahead of time.
- ShamelessC 4y agoI just quoted an article and said you weren't very convincing. You're still pretty unconvincing however, seeing you react so defensively suggests a bit of cognitive dissonance. At some point, the line always goes down. Just try to cash out before it does, and don't fool anyone to do so. See you in 8 years.