4 ms·
Not as much as you might think. After the Daily Mail (think Britain's answer to Fox News but with the additional benefit that you can use it to wipe yourself if
by tommorris 15y ago
Not as much as you might think. After the Daily Mail (think Britain's answer to Fox News but with the additional benefit that you can use it to wipe yourself if you are out of toilet roll) published a story saying that Amanda Knox's appeal had been rejected, we had an enormous discussion on the Reliable Sources Noticeboard about whether to ban the Daily Mail as a source.
We didn't reach consensus on whether to do so, but you can bet that the next time they do something equally stupid, said thread will come up in discussion. A few more major blunders and they will quite probably stop being considered a reliable source on WP.
- rmc 15y agoHere's an article from the Daily Mail saying Facebook Gives You Cancer: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1149207/How-using-Facebook-raise-risk-cancer.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1149207/How-using-... It's the blanket "all newspapers good, all blogs bad" simplistic idea that I think is nonsense.