4 ms·
In case you forgot, numerous states forbid people from even going outside their home, and from perusing numerous services if they weren't vaccinated. This was r
by CryptoPunk 4y ago
In case you forgot, numerous states forbid people from even going outside their home, and from perusing numerous services if they weren't vaccinated. This was restricting people's bodily autonomy under duress, to theoretically reduce the spread of a virus with a 99.5% infection survival rate. On the basis of prevailing legal norms, an entirely secular argument could absolutely be made for not allowing the eviction of a person from their mother's womb, to their death.
We put mothers and mostly fathers in prison for not providing child support. The latter never even had an option to abort their parental responsibilities the way mothers did during pregnancy. The idea that a non-religious argument against abortion can't exist in light of this is absurd.
>>Like I said - there are no logically valid arguments for abortion ban, other than strictly religious.
Like I said, believing abortion should be prohibited can be an entirely secular belief, your dogmatic denial notwithstanding.
- trasz 4y agoEntering public spaces because you’re potentially dangerous - because you are unvaccinated, are a sex offender, or you’re carrying a weapon - has nothing to do with bodily autonomy. As for child support - again, nothing to do with bodily autonomy, because the same happens in other directions, for failing to support other family members one is required to, not just one’s children. You still hadn’t managed to provide even a single secular reason to ban abortion. It’s not that they cannot exist - they perhaps could, but they don’t. “Prevailing legal norms” don’t matter, because they have been largely written to the tune of religious extremists; that’s where churches numerous privileges come from.