3 ms·
1) Unfortunately yes, I have seen some of that. I mean both the companies and the sideline quarterbacks. 2) Of course, but I’d hope most companies would be sma
by atty 4y ago
1) Unfortunately yes, I have seen some of that. I mean both the companies and the sideline quarterbacks.
2) Of course, but I’d hope most companies would be smart enough to be paying for productive output, not for bodily location.
3) Agreed. I personally prefer remote work, but I know many people who prefer going in - either to better structure their day, or to see others, and they should be able to do that. And I believe a competent company structure can support both of those work patterns. (At companies large enough for that sort of complexity)
- paulcole 4y ago> 2) Of course, but I’d hope most companies would be smart enough to be paying for productive output, not for bodily location I think on this point, you’re seeing companies who value control, consistency, and predictability over maximum productivity. They just think that they’d rather get less done overall and have more control over the people they hire because they know not everyone will be more productive in a remote environment. There’s nothing wrong w/ that. It’s not a decision everyone will agree w/ but that’s why resignation letters exist.