> What is motivating your interest in Schmelzer's papers? Isn't it obvious.. I am looking for meaningful, potent advances in physics. I am looking for the code

> What is motivating your interest in Schmelzer's papers? Isn't it obvious.. I am looking for meaningful, potent advances in physics. I am looking for the code of the universe: a coherent unified theory of everything. I am looking for a concrete resolution of quantum gravity which current status is a gigantic failure. I am looking for a theory that advance cosmological modeling. For insights about the singularities or even their non existence (see frozen stars) and most importantly for an epistemic and causal interpretation of quantum mechanics and credible sub-quantum (including hidden variables) theories. While I have no problem finding significant progress in Medecine topics, in physics I have much less expertise and the technical issues or progress towards those issues are much less googlable. There is this meme that physics do not progress on its major open problems since the 90s and that is true to a big extent. One of the reason being that there has been potentially very significant advances, like e.g this concrete Lorentz theory of gravity but 1) I can't find them and 2) they do not receive attention by the community, therefore the community and those theories do not progress.