Both sides need better communication. They are like oil and water in boiling degrees Credit where it's due, I think Windows Terminal's team did try to extend a

Both sides need better communication. They are like oil and water in boiling degrees Credit where it's due, I think Windows Terminal's team did try to extend an apology. (Sincere or not, what is the extent that you deem sincere enough) https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/10462#issuecomment-957992128 https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/10462#issuecomm... > We certainly handled the original issue poorly, and we're trying to do better. > We may not have taken the feedback seriously to begin with, but if it appears to have been completely dismissed then I am sorry. > Personally I'd like to also welcome @ cmuratori and @ mmozeiko back to give any comments if they wish to do so. Of course it'd be entirely understandable if they don't. Minimised comment https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/10462#issuecomment-873518251 https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/10462#issuecomm... > We‘re quite aware about the code and are extremely happy about what was created there. I mean it seriously: It sets a great goal for us to strive for. Unfortunately the code is intentionally GPLv2 licensed and we‘ll honor this wish entirely. As such no one at Microsoft will ever look at either of the links. Claims that they tried to communicate with Casey: > I‘ve talked with the author before and they made it abundantly clear they don’t wish to ever speak with us again. They‘re entirely welcome to return and take part in this project‘s discourse of course… I‘d be delighted if that was the case! -- What do everyone think of this?