3 ms·
Let's just say that is it correct that he is still known for his 2014 GAN work.
by supernova87a 4y ago
Let's just say that is it correct that he is still known for his 2014 GAN work.
- daenz 4y agoIt must be difficult to repeat the success of a once-in-a-lifetime finding.
- mumblemumble 4y agoI didn't take it to mean that, exactly. GANs are a very impressive trick. But their social cachet is not, as far as I'm aware, in proportion to people's success at using them for practical applications that generate revenue. So the implication might be, "Don't expect a brain drain in Apple's GAN department to have a significant impact on their business fortunes."
- yeahwhatever10 4y agoYou think GANs are once in a lifetime?
- daenz 4y agoGiven its impact on ML, for a single person to discover, yes.
- serenitylater 4y ago
- bogwog 4y agoAnonymously trashing someone on the internet like this is pathetic.
- make3 4y agohe's also known for single handedly starting the field of adversarial examples, which is a huge field. he basically started two fields. he's huge