2 ms·
Except tanks do the same thing with unguided shells. So the tank rounds are something like $500 each. In contrast, guided artillery shells are $100,000 or so e
by dragontamer 5y ago
Except tanks do the same thing with unguided shells.
So the tank rounds are something like $500 each. In contrast, guided artillery shells are $100,000 or so each.
I mean, Tomahawk cruise missiles ($1+ million bucks) probably have more destructive potential and accuracy than anything discussed here. But they're just too expensive to really be used as a bread-and-butter tactic.
-------
The artillery game is important for sure. But there's advantages to a direct-fire system that directly engages with the enemy. Besides, artillery + tanks work together as a team, a force multiplier. Tanks can call for artillery support after all.
EDIT: Case in point, a tank can approach the front-lines, and use its thermal-imaging / night-vision to be an artillery-spotter from 3+km away from the target. The tank can also survive "closer" to the enemy (danger close, if you will).
- kens 5y ago>So the tank rounds are something like $500 each. I was surprised that the military could get anything for $500, so I looked up tank round prices. They are more like $5000-$10000 (M829A4).
- dragontamer 5y ago> M829A4 That's using depleted uranium though, so I'm not surprised that's an expensive round. I'm looking up the M830 (HEAT), which is "just" explosives (with a bit of electronics), and that's closer to $1000. So my $500 estimate was definitely under the price of USA's ammo... but I'm pretty sure Russian ammo is cheaper.