3 ms·
While tanks are still necessary, your observations are not wrong - the US Marine Corps decided to get rid of tanks fairly recently: https://www.marinecorpstime
by smiley1437 4y ago
While tanks are still necessary, your observations are not wrong - the US Marine Corps decided to get rid of tanks fairly recently:
https://www.marinecorpstimes.com/flashpoints/2020/03/26/the-marines-want-to-get-rid-of-their-tanks-heres-why/ https://www.marinecorpstimes.com/flashpoints/2020/03/26/the-...
Quite prescient considering what we are seeing in Ukraine a couple years later with tanks being vulnerable especially when deployed so haphazardly by Russian Federation.
Bottom line - war games in 2018 showed that tanks and other armored vehicles in-range of near-peer drones, Anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMs) and Precision Guided Munitions (PGMs) were quite vulnerable - exactly like we're seeing in Ukraine.
There were other factors but the top marine decided no more tank battalions and greatly reduced artillery (among other changes).
Instead, these divestitures will be replaced by:
1. Precision long range fires (Naval Strike Missile\Joint Strike Missile (NSM\JSM), and possibly Extended Range Cannon Artillery (ERCA))
2. Unmanned lethal air and ground systems.
That tells you what the war games revealed as being effective in future combat.
- dragontamer 4y agoMarines got rid of tanks because Marines are focusing on a China vs Taiwan hypothetical conflict, where tanks would be nearly useless. China vs Taiwan would be largely about establishing control of islands, and maybe a few beach-assaults. Tanks don't work well on sand, and the 80-ton M1 Abrams is too heavy to fit on an assault-boat. ------ US Army has constantly developed tanks (and anti-tank weapons) because the tank remains a major battlefield player in Europe (Hypothetical... no wait... the now real Russia vs Ukraine situation)
- derbOac 4y agoSo it's all human ground personnel, missiles, and aircraft basically now (for land)?
- jmchuster 4y ago> The Corps says heavy ground armor will still be provided by the Army. That sounds more to me like the US Military decided it'd be more cost-efficient to only have the Army be responsible for tanks, and have the Marines be more focused on an amphibious role.