4 ms·

Not if it was literally covered up systemically at each warehouse where the issues lie? They're not omniscient.

• dragonwriter 4y ago
  > Not if it was literally covered up systemically at each warehouse where the issues lie? So, you think that they managed to systemically cover up their misdeeds from higher management before the election, but conveniently failed to continue that coverup after the union election. I mean, sure, you concoct a strained narrative which makes this a noble move by Amazon’s higher management, but...why strain to do that?
  • avgcorrection 4y ago
    It’s the Amazon senior manager cabal which manages to coordinate better and have better information across the whole company compared to the Amazon executives. You have not heard of it?
  • readthenotes1 4y ago
    I don't find that a strained narrative at all. -- I once wrote a status report where I reported that I thought something would be a problem blocking my progress if it weren't resolved. My manager's status report said that there might be a issue. His managers report said everything was on track. -- If you don't think that the upper management got into hot water and then started paying a lot more attention to their on-site managers after the Union vote, you and I live in different worlds.
  • Zamaamiro 4y ago
    Yup. You need to make a lot of assumptions arrive at this strained conclusion. Why not apply Occam’s razor?