3 ms·
Carbon from animals? That carbon was already part of the carbon cycle (name?), unlike carbon from petroleum sources. Am I misunderstanding you?
by avgcorrection 5y ago
Carbon from animals? That carbon was already part of the carbon cycle (name?), unlike carbon from petroleum sources. Am I misunderstanding you?
- wruza 5y agoIs that cycle natural? More people means more for-food animals, more petroleum on growing and logistics, doesn’t it. Everything depends on everything, there is no clear end of chain. Humans don’t naturally starve at scale anymore except in few fucked up regions.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- betwixthewires 5y agoMore people means more of that carbon locked up in biomass, in the form of humans as well as animal and plant food.