3 ms·
ACT is pretty well established scientifically at this point. There are controversies but not more than other things and they tend to be focused on the novelty o
by derbOac 5y ago
ACT is pretty well established scientifically at this point. There are controversies but not more than other things and they tend to be focused on the novelty of ACT concepts.
As to any particular implementation, that's a different issue.
- passivate 5y agoIts my own ignorance, but can you please link to data showing effectiveness?
- derbOac 5y agoSo it's interesting. Looking at the meta-analyses more closely than I have in the past raises more questions about ACT than I thought based on the way it's discussed in the literature. However, in general, the pattern is that it shows efficacy relative to controls but not greater than other treatments (although this is a common pattern in the psychotherapy literature that applies to almost every type of treatment): https://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/365764 https://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/365764 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032719313023 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016503271... https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796714001211 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000579671...
- passivate 5y agoInteresting, thank you for replying!