3 ms·
Can you elaborate what you consider the problem to be?
by stoltzmann 4y ago
Can you elaborate what you consider the problem to be?
- swayvil 4y agoSeriously? It's white, optimized for showing dirt. It's closest to the ground, optimized for getting dirty. And (In the case of your typical sneaker) It's a special weird porous rubber that is difficult to get clean, optimized for quickly looking like crap. And when your shoes look like crap it's time to buy new shoes. Thus we have shoes optimized for short lifespan. But this is dead obvious.
- stoltzmann 4y agoFrom anecdotal evidence, I've got the same pair of sneakers for... 4 years now I think? I'm using them daily and yeah, they've got dirty on the bottom, but I wouldn't consider throwing them out just due to that. I'll replace them once the sole is damaged to the point the shoes stop performing their function. At that point, it doesn't make a difference whether it's white or black for the sole. You could have made your point two replies earlier and it would be more clear what you consider the issue with white rubber to be.
- swayvil 4y agoYour professed ignorance strains my credulity. And pointing out the dead obvious is generally a fool's errand.
- Etheryte 4y agoHave you considered that you don't have to throw out your shoes just because they're dirty? You don't throw away your clothes when they're dirty, do you? What about dishes? I buy new shoes when my old shoes are broken and they can't be fixed anymore. If you like to throw away your shoes when they get dirty, you do you, but in that case you'll be throwing money at the very same industry you seem to strongly dislike. As a saner alternative, I recommend not caring so much about what your shoes look like, they're just shoes.
- swayvil 4y agoThat's quite beside my point.
- bowsamic 4y ago