2 ms·
I don’t think it’s problematic. Benchmarking to humans isn’t for the sake of an apples to apples comparison - that would be impossible since the human brain doe
by jstx1 5y ago
I don’t think it’s problematic. Benchmarking to humans isn’t for the sake of an apples to apples comparison - that would be impossible since the human brain doesn’t work like a convnet, not even close. It’s because human performance gives a good baseline by showing what’s possible; and also because for some tasks you might want to replace humans with algorithms. It’s much more about being pragmatic than being fair.
- Jack000 5y agothe brain as a whole doesn't work the same way as ANNs, but the visual cortex in particular is extremely similar to a convnet. We even know which layers are responsible for which features, on a coarse scale: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089662730700774X https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089662730... the visual cortex uses local receptive fields to organize features in a hierarchical manner, exactly like a convnet.