2 ms·
I agree. Additionally, if it was true then I'd imagine they'd name Windows95 "windows 3.11/32" or somesuch.
by rnd0 4y ago
I agree. Additionally, if it was true then I'd imagine they'd name Windows95 "windows 3.11/32" or somesuch.
- lproven 4y agoWindows 3.11 was a thing, separate from Windows for Workgroups. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_3.1x#Windows_3.11 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_3.1x#Windows_3.11 But I think this also explains why Windows for Workgroups was also only version 3.1 and 3.11. WfWg 3.11 was a _major_ rewrite, with a whole new 32-bit filesystem (called VFAT and pulled from the WIP Windows Chicago, AKA Windows 95), a 32-bit network stack and more. But they kept the version number. How mysterious, huh?