It bums me out to see this, because it seems to boil good science down to FACTS and ANSWERS. Were you really dying to know what bronze age daggers were used for

It bums me out to see this, because it seems to boil good science down to FACTS and ANSWERS. Were you really dying to know what bronze age daggers were used for for your next board meeting? If it's just for curiosity, isn't the methodology and capability atleast as interesting and much more important? Valuing how we know things, not just what we think we might know is actual science.