3 ms·
He wrote "I'm sure some of the gap is because of mere correlation", so I think he IS grasping the point. Personally I thin it is OBVIOUS that TV is damaging ch
by gahahaha 15y ago
He wrote "I'm sure some of the gap is because of mere correlation", so I think he IS grasping the point.
Personally I thin it is OBVIOUS that TV is damaging children since it is unnatural the same way sugar is. The kids of our ancestors have been crawling around on the floor exploring and playing for millions of years - sitting in front of flickering lights for hours on end for just 30 years.
- vidarh 15y agoA lot of medicines are "unnatural the same way sugar is". Are they obviously damaging children too?
- gahahaha 15y agoIf the kids are otherwise healthy and eat a lot of the medicines, then yes, obviously. Eating a lot of medicines is OBVIOUSLY very bad for healthy children.
- vidarh 15y agoYou're moving the goalpost and being intentionally obtuse. Vaccines then. Clothes. Shoes. Want more examples of "unnatural" things? The point is to equate something being "unnatural", whatever that is supposed to mean, with it being "OBVIOUSLY bad" is so inane that I really do hope you're either a troll or just plain did not think through what you wrote.
- dantheman 15y agoReally, what's more unnatural than reading words on a page or manipulating figures.
- gahahaha 15y ago'"unnatural", whatever that is supposed to mean' It is supposed to mean huge changes from the relatively stable environment present during human evolution. The environment we are adapted to operating in. Unless you are a creationist, that should be pretty obvious.