4 ms·
This is some dense stuff. Do I understand this correctly? > Whilst the ‘everyday’ is, of course, a temporal designator, connected to the chronology of human e
by robonerd 4y ago
This is some dense stuff. Do I understand this correctly?
> Whilst the ‘everyday’ is, of course, a temporal designator, connected to the chronology of human experience, in reality, ‘everyday life’ historians have often used a spatial frame to seek to understand past historical actors’ everyday lives, experiences and practices. Focusing on Fascist Italy and using the example of ‘bars’ and the practices of consumption, political (and other) sociability, transaction and exchanges enacted within these spaces, this article explores some of the possibilities opened up by using a spatial frame to examine everyday practices and lived experiences in a dictatorial context.
"To understand what an average day was like for people, historians like to focus on a specific aspect of everyday life. We are going to talk about people going to bars in fascist Italy."
> Thinking about ‘everyday life’ and the lived experience of dictatorship through a spatial lens not only requires a shift in terms of the venues that we investigate, away from classic seats and sites of formal projections of power and towards those spaces – like bars – in which the ‘unofficial relations of power’ were articulated and negotiated.
"Talking about everyday people going to bars is different from talking about politicians doing their office stuff."
> It also prompts us to ‘play with scales’, as Jacques Revel put it, to examine the unit of the individual body, the street, or the city not just to identify microscopic historical practices, but to understand how macroscopic structures, processes and power relations operated at the level of the everyday and vice versa, highlighting dynamic, reciprocal relationships – between institutions and individuals, state and society, centre and periphery, and among historical actors themselves – and to examine the processes of movement between these scales of experience.
"Talking about the daily lives of everyday people help us understand the role their opinions and lives played in the course of history."
> In this way, through the examination of interactions and practices enacted in Italian bars, the article will explore a novel facet of the ‘lived experience’ of these dictatorships and demonstrate the value in understanding dictatorships as being constructed neither exclusively ‘from above’ or ‘from below’ but both between and across these units of analysis.
"We're going to talk about people going to bars and show you the why it's good to understand the role common people play in a dictatorship."