3 ms·
Another prime example of how ML and AI aren't mature. With all the data google collects, they have to rely on minimum wagers to "find" the best results.
by Justin_K 4y ago
Another prime example of how ML and AI aren't mature. With all the data google collects, they have to rely on minimum wagers to "find" the best results.
- xnx 4y agoIn the sense that ML and AI aren't yet AGI, yes, but this doesn't mean that Google's ML and AI aren't very useful and benefit from having another source of training and validation data.
- dfdz 4y agoThis criticism seems unfair. There is nothing wrong with semi-supervised learning.
- kappuchino 4y agoActually, ML/AI would not know by the rules of Google for "Quality" how to rate content, since content is ever changing and diverse as it gets. If you spend some time reading the guide (https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/guidelines.raterhub.com/en//searchqualityevaluatorguidelines.pdf https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/guidelines.raterh...) you will realize that its not about the "best" results but on classificaion / verificationin the YMYL (Your Money, Your Life) areas that should not be left to machines in the first place. Money is mainly low because there are so many people that can do the job and so many that are needed to redundantly rate the content.