1. No. 2. Yes, given the assumption that it's something I'd use. One caveat to that is I would hard pass on a subscription model. 3. It's possible that I woul

1. No. 2. Yes, given the assumption that it's something I'd use. One caveat to that is I would hard pass on a subscription model. 3. It's possible that I would not want to use it but that would depend on the problem it's intended to solve. (This is getting close to, "I would not find it useful," as forbidden by the assumption.) 4. I would consider paying if I had good reason to believe they wouldn't share my data. Their products are genuinely useful because of how they process the data they gather, even if that processing happens on their machines. Privacy concerns only really come into play when 1) they share large swaths of that data with business partners and 2) they have a large-scale data breach. 5. Given the way Meta explicitly tries to track people who have never even had an account for one of their services, this question reads like extortion. (I expect you're more well-intentioned but still, that's a hell of a consideration.) In short: hell no. 6. Same as 5.