4 ms·
This isn’t regressive at all. It’s a way to preserve and document something that will probably be deleted or made private. The alternative is maybe putting it i
by throwaway1777 4y ago
This isn’t regressive at all. It’s a way to preserve and document something that will probably be deleted or made private. The alternative is maybe putting it into a pastebin or rehosting the text somewhere but somehow it seems less trustworthy that way even though photoshop exists. For accessibility purposes alt-text should be possible.
- endisneigh 4y agohttps://imgur.com/ju8XgGd https://imgur.com/ju8XgGd
- kyle-rb 4y agoTwitter allows alt text but it's dependent on the user including it when they post (@collision did not) and it's limited to 1000 characters.
- sillysaurusx 4y ago4000. Still too few.
- greenthrow 4y agoIt's super regressive. You should be able to maintain all the content and all formatting and styling using far less data than a PNG or JPG of that same text requires. Images of text are super wasteful and their ubiquity is a condemnation of us both as users and software engineers.
- micromacrofoot 4y agoIt's definitely regressive, it's not even accessible. Some people literally won't even be able to read it.