3 ms·
Don't cherrypick it then. The rest of the piece explains it. He's not someone who just walks into a collaborative process with wholly self-completed works of na
by Tao332 4y ago
Don't cherrypick it then. The rest of the piece explains it. He's not someone who just walks into a collaborative process with wholly self-completed works of natural brilliance. Instead, he's someone who knows how to facilitate the emergence of a genius-level chemistry between himself and another.
Now you can see that he is saying that Paul is a genius, just that his true genius isn't exactly what we think it is when we talk about creative genius.
- robotresearcher 4y ago> He's not someone who just walks into a collaborative process with wholly self-completed works of natural brilliance 'Yesterday': “I woke up with a lovely tune in my head,” he told author Barry Miles for the biography Many Years From Now, which was published in 1998. “I thought, ‘That’s great, I wonder what that is?’ There was an upright piano next to me, to the right of the bed by the window. I got out of bed, sat at the piano, found G, found F sharp minor 7th – and that leads you through then to B to E minor, and finally back to E. It all leads forward logically. I liked the melody a lot but because I’d dreamed it I couldn’t believe I’d written it.” https://www.biography.com/news/paul-mccartney-the-beatles-yesterday-dream https://www.biography.com/news/paul-mccartney-the-beatles-ye...
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]