> Seriously? The signature for dgemm is (...) The signature of gemm is trivial if you're aware of the basics of handling dense row-major/column-major matrices.

> Seriously? The signature for dgemm is (...) The signature of gemm is trivial if you're aware of the basics of handling dense row-major/column-major matrices. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/documentation/onemkl-developer-reference-fortran/top/blas-and-sparse-blas-routines/blas-routines/blas-level-3-routines/gemm.html https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/documentatio... https://www.netlib.org/lapack/explore-html/db/dc9/group__single__blas__level3_gafe51bacb54592ff5de056acabd83c260.html https://www.netlib.org/lapack/explore-html/db/dc9/group__sin... I haven't met a single person who did any number crunching work whatsoever who ever experienced any problem doing basic matrix-matrix products with BLAS. Complaining about flags to handle row-major/column-major matrices while boasting about being an authority on number crunching is something that's not credible at all.