4 ms·
Got it! Not household use but total national energy usage divided by population. It’s per capita energy usage but I hesitate to call it per capita consumption.
by zaroth 4y ago
Got it! Not household use but total national energy usage divided by population.
It’s per capita energy usage but I hesitate to call it per capita consumption. Consumption would probably want take into account the massive trade deficit, and so its even higher!
- dredmorbius 4y agoConsumption would probably want take into account the massive trade deficit, and so its even higher! That would be correct :-/ The true raw material footprint of nations 03 September 2013 https://web.archive.org/web/20130906063246/https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/science-technology/true-raw-material-footprint-nations https://web.archive.org/web/20130906063246/https://newsroom.... The material footprint of nations Thomas O. Wiedmann [email protected], Heinz Schandl, Manfred Lenzen, +3 , Daniel Moran, Sangwon Suh, James West, and Keiichiro Kanemoto-3 September 3, 2013 | 112 (20) 6271-6276 | https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220362110 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220362110 https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1220362110 https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1220362110