4 ms·
I don’t think this makes sense. The SEC isn’t there to protect the share holders, I don’t know wtf this is. The only thing they could be required to disclose w
by lettergram 4y ago
I don’t think this makes sense. The SEC isn’t there to protect the share holders, I don’t know wtf this is.
The only thing they could be required to disclose was the percent of sales THEY KNEW were being used for crypto. They also wouldn’t be required to capture that data really. Plus I’ve been on their quarterly calls, they’ve been pretty open about their exposure to crypto so idk.
This seems well beyond the scope of the SEC... imo it’s their broader plan to go after crypto, but everyone knows they have no legal basis currently to do so.