3 ms·
Yes, they use the money in order to maintain the house. Furthermore owner-occupancy is a thing, where the landlord does some maintenance themselves. However no
by endisneigh 5y ago
Yes, they use the money in order to maintain the house. Furthermore owner-occupancy is a thing, where the landlord does some maintenance themselves.
However no matter what, no landlord can maintain all aspects of the house alone. You think a single person can be a master of all trades and have all equipment on hand all of the time in an apartment, for instance?
Why does it even matter if someone pays others to maintain the house? Do you think there are people who build modern houses alone with no machinery?
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 5y agoI believe the argument would be that the tenant might be empowered to pay for their own maintenance if they're not paying rent to a landlord.
- endisneigh 5y agoCan’t said tenant just buy a house then?
- diordiderot 5y agoBecause homes are overpriced, because they're treated as capital instead of a durable good & because all financial / building policy advantages existing homeowners
- endisneigh 5y agoOk, so if you can’t or don’t want to buy you rent. No one is entitled anything. Or you can move to a less desirable area that’s cheaper. Overpriced or not, people still buy.