3 ms·
We used to run it self hosted, but the architecture is rather complex, so we ended up switching to their SaaS offering. I tried advocating [0] for a leaner arch
by drej 4y ago
We used to run it self hosted, but the architecture is rather complex, so we ended up switching to their SaaS offering. I tried advocating [0] for a leaner architecture for simpler setups + to run integration tests against... but it wasn't met with much enthusiasm.
I imagine 99% of installations (and certainly CI pipelines) would be fine with their wsgi webserver and sqlite instead of Clickhouse, Relay, memcached, nginx, Postgres, Kafka and a host of other services. I wanted to take a stab at this myself, but given the complexity of the system, uncertainty of being able to merge it back, and, last but not least, their license, I decided against it.
[0]: https://github.com/getsentry/sentry/issues/32794 https://github.com/getsentry/sentry/issues/32794
- kenrick95 4y agoThis has been the experience at my company as well. The previous version of Sentry Server was okay-ish to self-host, but the newest version requires setting up some more services that our infra unwilling to setup/maintain as they are different from the tech stack that our devs use in the company. We ended up with SaaS too