>"Inclusiveness" is a pretty loaded term which doesn't really seem to apply when you consider how it is used elsewhere. How exactly is "inclusiveness" inapprop

>"Inclusiveness" is a pretty loaded term which doesn't really seem to apply when you consider how it is used elsewhere. How exactly is "inclusiveness" inappropriate here? Because it goes against the agenda that inclusiveness is always good? I guess using different synonyms for positive and negative connotations is one way to preserve doublethink.