3 ms·
You seem to be confusing descriptive for normative. They're stating a fact, not asserting the fact justifies some behavior.
by _jal 4y ago
You seem to be confusing descriptive for normative.
They're stating a fact, not asserting the fact justifies some behavior.
- Ansil849 4y agoIt's a glib fact (and in fact, not even a fact as you by definition cannot assert something that didn't happen as a fact) that detracts from the theft. But sure, yes, if they had not been stolen, certain items may have been destroyed. OK. And, so what, what's your point beyond this trite truism?