3 ms·

Let's focus on Anwar Al-Awlaki. I wasn't talking about Anwar Al-Awlaki. I was talking about what happened to his children. So sorry, but I will not be able t

Let's focus on Anwar Al-Awlaki. I wasn't talking about Anwar Al-Awlaki. I was talking about what happened to his children. So sorry, but I will not be able to join you on whatever semantic buggy ride it is you're trying to pull me onto.

yucky 4y ago
>I wasn't talking about Anwar Al-Awlaki No, you intentionally ignored the entire point of the OP. And you did that because it is a case where President Obama ordered the assassination of a US citizen, and that citizen stayed on his hit list for 18 months until he was killed, despite his family begging the US government the entire time to charge him with a crime so that he could have his day in court. https://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/935/Al-Aulaqi-v-Obama-et-al/ https://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/935/Al-Aula...
- akhmatova 4y ago
  No, you intentionally ignored the entire point of the OP. Right - because their intellectual dishonesty was so blatant that it not only distracts from, but actually cheapens the morally indignant point they were trying to make.
  - yucky 4y ago
    Why do you think we shouldn't be morally indignant about a US President ordering the assassination of a US citizen?
    - akhmatova 4y ago
      You can be indignant about whatever you want. But as said, I am longer able you to accompany you on this semantic exercise.