4 ms·

NB: the conference is about cryptography, not crypto"currency".

• deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
• mooreds 5y ago
  Thanks, I updated the title to make it clearer.
  • zonotope 5y ago
    For those of us still beating the "crypto == cryptography" drum, maybe it'd be more satisfying to leave the title as it was ;)
    • 0xdeadb00f 5y ago
      LOL so true
• MattPalmer1086 5y ago
  Something that irritates all cryptographers!
  • senectus1 5y ago
    I'm not really into either and it annoys me.
• SilasX 5y ago
  Submission title has it now: “Themes from Real World Crypto(graphy) 2022” If we’re gonna ditch bad abbreviations, though, how about NB? It’s not in common use in most places, and isn’t much shorter than, say, “Note:”.
  • jesushax 5y ago
    I think it's fun and pretentious, so I vote to keep it! Besides, "NB" emphasizes that we should note well, not just note. Are you implying we should note /poorly/??? Yeah it's probably not practical, though. But does everything have to be?
    • SilasX 5y ago
      When the abbreviation exists to save time, yes.
      • jesushax 5y ago
        That's why it exists for you maybe! For me it exists to be fun and historical.
        • SilasX 5y ago
          Then you might be neglecting the needs of a major party in your communications.
• Ar-Curunir 5y ago
  There is non-trivial overlap between the two, especially in projects using fairly advanced crypto like zkSNARKs, threshold signing protocols, pairing-based accumulators, etc. in general the cryptocurrency space is far ahead of normal tech in deploying advanced cryptography.