4 ms·
Well, I don't believe it's not their right, but I am otherwise in agreement with you - it's daft to block such functionality. Ultimately, that's the creator's
by detritus 4y ago
Well, I don't believe it's not their right, but I am otherwise in agreement with you - it's daft to block such functionality.
Ultimately, that's the creator's mistake to make and it's incumbent upon the end-user to read the content as they can, if they must.
I'm not sure why people believe they have a right to dictate how someone else's content is created.
I guess I'm more talking about individuals here, not organisations, but I think the problem lies more in individual's websites.
- Ansil849 4y ago> I'm not sure why people believe they have a right to dictate how someone else's content is created. I do not believe anyone here is at all believing that they have a right to dictate how someone else's content is created. The argument is about modification, not creation. People should absolutely have the ability to modify their local version of the content to make it readable to them.