> It's not contrarian...there's simply no evidence either way, that's all I'm saying. For every anecdote... This isn't dueling anecdotes, it is the application

> It's not contrarian...there's simply no evidence either way, that's all I'm saying. For every anecdote... This isn't dueling anecdotes, it is the application of common sense and reason. You're taking a contrarian position against that, and lack of evidence (if that is indeed the case) doesn't create an "anything goes" situation where that take is on even footing with what you're arguing against.