3 ms·
This is great. Agree. SPAs for everything is ridiculous. My opinion below. 1. The web was designed for content. Thus... 2. If a site is content focused, no
by ijidak 4y ago
This is great.
Agree. SPAs for everything is ridiculous.
My opinion below.
1. The web was designed for content. Thus...
2. If a site is content focused, no need for a SPA. The web already works for it as is.
3. If a web app is a forms based application, still probably no need for a SPA. (The web was designed to support forms almost from the beginning.)
4. If a web app has complex user interactions (e.g. drag and drop, etc. Think, word processor, photo editing, etc.) on a "Single Page". Or jumping between different views of the same data from a single page. Then, logically, that is a real single page application! And a SPA fits the use case.
Otherwise, a SPA is too much engineering to solve a trivial software engineering problem.
- soneca 4y agoAgree with what? OP is no making any point, just a joke. And if I am to take the joke more serious, it would mean that there is no defense whatsoever for using SPA. It just indefensible. Which is a different argument of ”SPA for everything is ridiculous”. So either there is no point for you to agree with or you disagree.