Yea, I believe they made that fairly clear in this paragraph of the article. > Instead of invoking Linux executables, like shell does, the JavaScript sandbox c

Yea, I believe they made that fairly clear in this paragraph of the article. > Instead of invoking Linux executables, like shell does, the JavaScript sandbox can invoke Wasm. If you have some computational heavy lifting, like image resizing, it probably makes sense to use Wasm rather than writing it in JS. Just like you wouldn’t write image resizing code in bash, you’d spawn imagemagick. I agree with you all. WASM should be the solution to the problem in this space.