I don't understand this argument. Leaving aside the fact that the examples provided in the link are hardly works of art, the "creator" has already created somet

I don't understand this argument. Leaving aside the fact that the examples provided in the link are hardly works of art, the "creator" has already created something the way they wanted to, as has every other website designer. And just like there would be no good reason for an editor to stop me from using a magnifying glass on a book that I bought, nor from writing notes in the pages or highlight parts of the text (advisedly or not), neither does anything justify disabling zoom. For whatever reason, my Firefox was already ignoring these artificial restrictions intended by the creators, and I was able to zoom as normal. Does that affect the creators of these websites in any way whatsoever?