5 ms·

> It's the only protest I know of that seems to have been planned two weeks before Who are you trying to convince with this weak argument? Is the fact that it

> It's the only protest I know of that seems to have been planned two weeks before Who are you trying to convince with this weak argument? Is the fact that it was anticipated in advance somehow invalidating? Nothing you assert follows from what you’ve proffered (separate from the fact that what you assert is wrong). > Last year people were talking about state's rights to prevent from being forced to take a medical treatment they didn't want. Oh, so you mean another thing that most people agree with (compulsory vaccination to participate in society) being made into an issue so an rejectionist core can throw a tantrum and get lots of people killed along the way?

usrn 4y ago
>compulsory vaccination to participate in society That's extremely far from agreed upon, but if you want to take people's medical choices away as a condition for participating in society I don't see how you can even make an argument for abortion. > Is the fact that it was anticipated in advance somehow invalidating It didn't occur to me that they might register the domain in advance of the ruling just in case. That seems a little strange but I've never planned (or even attended) a political protest so I guess I wouldn't know.
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]