3 ms·
Apple’s Earnings Fall Below Street Expectations
- jchrisa 15y agoApple may be one of the only companies that can get away with this without being punished in stock price.
- bennesvig 15y agoDown 23 points at the moment in after hours trading. http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=aapl http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=aapl
- radicaldreamer 15y agoThe stock is down over 6% in after hours trading.
- chugger 15y agoFor the quarter, Apple posted revenue of $28.27 billion and net quarterly profit of $6.62 billion, or $7.05 per diluted share, compared to revenue of $20.34 billion and net quarterly profit of $4.31 billion, or $4.64 per diluted share, in the year-ago quarter. Apple's yearly profit and revenue were company records with Apple reporting more than $100 billion in yearly revenue for the first time ever. Typical BS. These are the same clueless analysts who predicted iPhone 4S sales were going to be a disaster. This is a blockbuster quarter for Apple. They earned $8 Billion more than the year-ago quarter.
- chugger 15y agoThis too. Apple profits jump 54% on record sales Only idiot Wall street analysts would be disappointed by a 54% jump in profit.
- mcphilip 15y agoI doubt anyone's disappointed that profits jumped 54%. The disappointment is that the earnings did not meet the street's expectations.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- Symmetry 15y agoIf you expected a 64% jump in profits and bought the stock at a premium on the basis of that then you actually do have a right to be disappointed.
- chugger 15y agowhy would you buy stock at a premium unless you're buying put options?
- clarky07 15y agoApple isn't selling at a premium though. It has a pe of < 12 when you take out the cash. I agree that things go down when expectations aren't met, the thing is the expectations don't make any sense at all. Apple is the only company in the world that could grow 54%, have a pe of 12, and still go down.
- chugger 15y ago@clarky07 exactly. Apple's PE is unbeleivably low. if you put Apple on the same PE multiple it traded on in 2006, Apple's market cap would be $1 Trillion. Why Apple might just be the first $1 trillion company http://blogs.reuters.com/columns/2011/08/09/why-apple-might-just-be-the-first-1-trillion-company/ http://blogs.reuters.com/columns/2011/08/09/why-apple-might-...
- davidedicillo 15y ago"So why the miss? Well for one thing, Apple’s iPhone sales dipped over 3 million compared to last quarter. This is undoubtedly because the world was awaiting the next version, the iPhone 4S, which launched last week." Exactly, indeed they sold 4M just in a weekend.
- bjtitus 15y agoAnd these sales were not reported in the aforementioned quarter. I think this sell-off is extremely stupid and short-sighted. Q1 will be huge for Apple, especially with holiday sales.
- georgemcbay 15y ago"I think this sell-off is extremely stupid and short-sighted." Taken at face value I think the whole thing is stupid too and I say that as someone who dislikes Apple and refuses to buy their products personally. However, whether or not this situation is really stupid and short-sighted depends upon who you're talking about, the guys starting it off (evil, not stupid) or the herd who follows them (stupid). The basic idea is this: 1) Initiate Apple sell-off (via analyst number games and maybe even selling off a small percentage of your own large holdings) 2) Wait for the herd to follow you, driving the price down significantly. Buy back during the dip. 3) Profit (as price goes back up to reality)! I've heard from many different people in the finance sector that Apple stock is the go-to stock for large player manipulation these days.
- yaykyle 15y ago"Apple’s own guidance for the quarter was $25 billion in revenue" - So they didn't miss their own goal.
- Steko 15y agoApple's guidance has historically been laughably low.
- chugger 15y agoso a quarterly revenue of $25 billion is "laughably" low?
- nobody314159 15y agoNo - it's saying Apple routinely lies about it's expected earnings so that every quarter there is a headline saying "Apple earnings beat expectations" So the street takes Apple's figures and add 20% because they know Apple always understates by 20%, so on those figures Apple didn't do as well as they should have. The problem is that you don't know if Apple really expected $30Bn and under-performed or really expected $25Bn and over-performed. Apple is a public company with shareholders and has a legal(and moral) duty to actually produce honest figures. Ultimately massaging them down is just as bad for investors as talking them up.
- chugger 15y agothese "estimates" are artificially inflated by hedge funds with short positions in AAPL. AAPL didn't lie. they're just conservative.
- Steko 15y agoNo there's a huge difference between lying and what Apple does. Apple produces extremely conservative figures that take into account all sorts of negative things that can impact the quarter like some Foxconn factory blows up or gets shut down.
- jpadvo 15y agoThis is not a story about Apple Computer, this is a story about analysts who mis-predicted something. Apple had predicted revenue of $25 billion, and they actually had revenue of $28.27 billion, their second best quarter ever. So why did this fall below the expectations of the analysts? The article gives one clue: "Well, even though Apple’s own guidance for the quarter was $25 billion in revenue, analysts seem to have wised up to Apple’s always-low estimates and were projecting numbers far higher: they were looking for around $29.5 billion. Apple came in at $28.27 billion." The analysts assumed that Apple would do so insanely well that the only way to accurately predict how well they would do was to wildly overestimate. Turns out, they did overestimate. Here are a few alternate headlines that could be applied equally well to this story: "The iPhone 4S launch gives Apple second best quarter ever" or "Apple exceeds their expected revenue by $3.27 billion dollars" I'd rather read about what actually happened and why, then to read about how somebody misestimated what was going to happen.
- swombat 15y agoActually, from the sound of it, the iPhone 4S launch is not even in that quarter.
- jpadvo 15y agoWow, thanks for pointing that out. That completely invalidates one of invalidates one of the alternate headlines. My reading-comprehension-fu must be weak right now.
- bjtitus 15y agoI think this is the key point here. I believe that these estimates would have been met had 4S sales been included in the earnings. Did these analysts assume that 4S sales would be included? Are they simply overlooking those sales for next quarter?
- ajross 15y agoThis is not a story about Apple Computer, this is a story about analysts who mis-predicted something It cuts both ways though. Apple has routinely exceeded (i.e. underestimated) their own revenue numbers for the past few quarters. From Apple's perspective alone, that sounds good because it means their stock shoots up and they get good press. But it means that people who hedged based on the expected numbers got hurt. That annoys people trying to make a living trading (whether those people deserve to make a living trading is entirely a different issue). So the analysts correct, and bake that offset into their estimates. And Apple "missed" based on those estimates. So people who hedged based on the new guesses have to dump the stock, and it drops. That's just the way investment markets work. Apple can't ride the "unexpectedly good news!" waves without getting hurt by the "oops, not as insanely great as expected" quarters.
- swombat 15y agoTime to buy Apple shares if you have any money to invest...
- georgekv 15y agoThe thing I noted was their guidance for next quarter which is $37 billion. That is a helluva lot of iPhones.
- mlinsey 15y agoImpressive that iPhone sales, despite dipping vs. the previous quarter, were actually up 21% year-over-year. The year-ago quarter was the iPhone 4's launch quarter. If I'm remembering correctly, the iPhone 4 was supply-constrained around launch but could be found in stores somewhat easily by the end of August 2010. Undoubtedly the presence of the Verizon iPhone accounts for most of this difference, but it's still very impressive that the iPhone 4 had many more sales in its last quarter (as the flagship phone) than its launch quarter.
- shalmanese 15y agoIf the market is efficient, then companies should fall below expectations exactly 50% of the time.
- Steko 15y agoI think the most interesting thing is the number of iPads (11 mil up 20% from previous quarter). Apple will need exactly 15 million in the holiday quarter to hit their 40 million goal for 2011. I really didn't think they would make it after their ipad 2 supply problems in the Jan-Mar quarter where they only sold 4.69 mil but it looks like they may pull it out. Maybe someone's bonus is on the line if they don't ship 40 million :)
- hvs 15y agoOK, someone explain this to me because I've never understood: 1) Company says it's going to make $1.00/share 2) "Analysts" says it's going to make $1.10/share 3) Company actually makes $1.05/share 4) OMG sell the stock!!1! it missed some arbitrary number!1 I'm a libertarian, but crap like this really irks me.
- chugger 15y agoread my comment above.
- harryh 15y agoThe current stock price is set by the market. It's (at least to a large degree) based on the market's best estimate of the future earnings of the company. This is certainly related to the company's public statements on the topic but as companies often "under promise so they can over deliver" it's not exact. So now, new information has come in that slightly changes the market's view of the company's future. How else do you think it should work?
- rayiner 15y agoThe company has an incentive to under promise and over deliver. The analysts are morons.
- kooshball 15y agoWhy does this irk you? It's a (mostly) free market and people do as they please. The stock price follows that naturally. Before the earning, the stock is priced in at the value from 2). After the earning, the stock drops down to the price that's valued with the actual earning numbers, which is lower than 2). This should not be a huge surprise to anyone. The apple case here is only slightly exceptional in that Apple is known for giving very conservative guidances, which is why the analyst's estimates are almost always higher than the guidance. In the past quarters, even that number was exceeded. It's just not the case here and the stock drops accordingly. I do think there is likely potential for future growth given the extremely high guidance given for Q1, which knowning Apple, is still conservative. disclosure: i'm long aapl
- brudgers 15y ago>"This is undoubtedly because the world was awaiting the next version, the iPhone 4S, which launched last week." Apple announced their upcoming announcement on September 21. The quarter ended September 24. Soft sales for the quarter were almost certainly due to strong competition and a more commoditized market for smart phones. The spike in 4S orders may be due to the T-mobile roll out and the fact that T-mobile has offered its subscribers no contract plans at a discount when the subscriber purchases their own handset. I suspect the 4S is having the effect of converting many of those accounts to two year contracts and a meaningful fraction of 4S orders are a side effect of those conversions.
- nobody314159 15y agoBut people have been expecting an iPhone 5 all summer so they may have put off buying an iPhone 4 even before the official 4s launch.
- nfm 15y ago"25 billion iOS devices sold last quarter." What?