4 ms·
Thanks for taking the time to answer everyone's questions, and for asking me this one. My own personal preference would be if you could please support PG, beca
by doctor_eval 5y ago
Thanks for taking the time to answer everyone's questions, and for asking me this one.
My own personal preference would be if you could please support PG, because in that case I could be confident of going into production with what I configure, even if it's less scaleable than CockroachDB. I'd really prefer to be learning about how Zitadel works, rather than learning CDB or trying to remember sqlite cli commands.
I'm happy to give CDB a spin once Zitadel 2.0 comes out, but it will add to the burden of onboarding it into my stack, and I'd think that's something you'd like to avoid going forward :)
- ffo 5y agoWell thank you for your time. Let me check with the team. I am certain we can release 2.X with a Postgresql support ;-) I created an issue for further tracking https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/3598 https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/3598
- doctor_eval 5y agoThat rocks. Thank you. I’ve been hanging out for a more lightweight IAM/IDP solution, quite literally for years. I really hope yours is it.
- ffo 5y agoWe too ;-)