4 ms·
OP - since you posted this, I will address you directly. You posted this with intent to do what, exactly? "Start a discussion?" And I'm looking at this fragmen
by antiverse 4y ago
OP - since you posted this, I will address you directly.
You posted this with intent to do what, exactly? "Start a discussion?" And I'm looking at this fragment in particular:
> For the past five years, I have been playing catch up in the games that the people around me were playing while I was playing the science game. The people I grew up around, especially the women who were least impressed with the science game, turn out not to be stupid at all, and to be far ahead of me in more enduring games, such as the understanding others game, the fathoming reality game, and the being a good person game. I’m the skinny little runt who’s just glad to get to play.
I don't know if you're trying to score points with the babes with this kneeling attitude, but Science (with a capital S) and the Arts (with a capital A) are both, individually, going to endure far more, for far longer, than you give either of them credit for.
Secondly, I don't know if you thought that women were stupid prior to having this epiphany that there's more than one way to live a life, and you're coming clean about some latent sexism or whatever you're going through, but if so, you might as well spell it out for us so we can drop the pretense with the starry-eyed rebirth blog post.
- noitpmeder 4y agoI think the author's purpose could be as simple as "don't be as quick as I was to judge other people". Did you post this with intent to sound aggressive?
- TedDoesntTalk 4y agoThis. There are different kinds of intelligence. Your intelligence in one area can blind you to the intelligence others have in different areas.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]