> but it's better than the alternative Which of many possible alternatives and how do you demonstrate that it's better on any of the areas where tradeoffs are

> but it's better than the alternative Which of many possible alternatives and how do you demonstrate that it's better on any of the areas where tradeoffs are made? Having a government managed but privately delivered program, having a totally privatised program, having a completely government run program? Having the private firm take on the risk instead of the taxpayer? having the risk split 50/50?