3 ms·
> chooses an imperative language to define circuit topologies hmm.. maybe that's ok if they don't go too overboard and encourage a functional style > uses & a
by ris 4y ago
> chooses an imperative language to define circuit topologies
hmm.. maybe that's ok if they don't go too overboard and encourage a functional style
> uses & as an in-place, mutating operator
that's it, I'm out of here
- bb88 4y agoI agree. '&' should not mutate. In this case it's simple to do: net1 = pin1, pin2, pin3 design = net1, net2, net3...